Inside the SWAT Lab

By -

So here’s what you missed out on in Beth’s Lab:

Beth brought back water samples from the Philippines in the form of Semipermeable Membrane Devices) SPMD’s and Silicone Monitoring Device Wristbands. We are testing the accuracy of the two different methods and see which method provides the best results on water contamination.

The SPMD’s are ‘a passive sampling device used to monitor trace levels of organic contaminants. When placed in an aquatic environment, SPMDs accumulate hydrophobic (water-“hating,” fat-“loving”) organic compounds, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and organochlorine pesticides from the surrounding waters’ (NOAA). The silicon devices could be used as a passive sampler in aqueous deployments. They  are small, lightweight that also monitor air pollution by absorbing chemicals. They are called ‘passive because they do not require any maintenance or power to work’ (Oregon State University, Passive wristband samplers).

SPMD’s Article : https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/tools/spmds/spmds.html

Passive wristband Samplers : https://ehsc.oregonstate.edu/passive-wristband-samplers

Also take the time and read an article written about Dr. Polidoro and her research by ASU Global Engagement. ‘Tiny little pieces of plastic are getting into everything, September 18, 2019’. Beth Polidoro and her ASU SWAT lab set out to make the oceans and the seafood we eat safe from microplastics and other pollutants.
https://asunow.asu.edu/20190918-global-engagement-asu-beth-polidoro-swat-lab-seafood-safe-microplastics

 


Comments

  1. Burabari AkeehOctober 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM

    I been following your project through Francisco's blog. I find it so interesting that you got water from the Philippines to test. Are you going to compare the Philippines' water to the United States' water? I hope the two methods work and you guys find the more accurate one. Good luck o your project and miss you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post Week 12

By -
Image
This week in Lab the only plastic I am waiting to weigh is SPI6. The reason this one is taking longer is because when I rinsed it with DI water it soaked some of the water up which meant I had to leave it in longer to dry out than the other plastics. Then when it was completely done drying I put the hydrogen peroxide to get rid of any nature products that could have been left behind. Right now they are still drying, until they are completely dry is when I will then be weighing it and that will conclude my last sample for weighing. After that I will finally have all data to analyze. I will be determining which extraction method/ water solution works best on microplastics. I will also be determining plastic loss in all three different solutions and see if there was a was to better change the protocol that the NOAA developed for extraction of microplastics from sediments.
Read more

Blog Post Week 6

By -
Image
This week in lab I finished all the NaCl samples that were run through the vacuum machine. I also ran them with hydrogen peroxide for at least 3 days so that it could get rid of all the nature particles that could be perhaps ruin the measuring at the end. Once all the samples were dried there were some that had sodium chloride attached to them, so because that could have been also a percent error when measuring the plastic I had to clean them and wash them off with DI water and run them through the vacuum machine again. In the process of doing that I ran out of the filters that are attached to the machine so I really only got done with half of the 30 samples. Matt will be ordering more filters the following week but mean while I will be getting the next samples ready that will be run with potassium carbonate. I will have to shred more plastic for all 30 samples again. I have finished collecting sediment and those will be distributed. Really wish we had one of these machines that could
Read more

WAESO Spring 2020

By -
Image
Abstract: Arizona: Lakes, Ponds, and Canals potential impacts of chemical exposures on aquatic bird species   Surface water in metro-Phoenix is contaminated due to urban pollutants, impacts from water reuse, soils, and other human interactions. Harmful contaminant levels, in addition to Nitrate-N, Phosphate- P, temperature, and dissolved O2 may possibly have negative consequences on resident and visiting bird species’ populations. Therefore, we conducted a two-year study of bird use of urban aquatic resources across the metro-Phoenix area, which has raised concerns about the transfer of chemical contaminants from surface water to bird species. The pattern that we see in bird populations in urban aquatic resources appears to be seasonal, with some study sites showing a year-round pattern of use. For highly-used aquatic sites in particular, we report concentrations of water contaminants that may be impacting aquatic bird species. Given that Phoenix is part of the Urban Bird Treaty pro
Read more